Posted by: Dan | August 15, 2007

Cellular Evolution Papers

Back in July, BioEssays had a slew of interesting papers on cellular evolution, and July had another, that I thought worth mentioning:

Finding treasures in frozen cells: new centriole intermediates – recent findings from cryo-electron tomography give insights into centriole biogenesis.

Evolution of size and pattern in the social amoebas – The fruiting bodies of slime molds comprise the earliest communal cell-cell interactions, and this essay examines the diversity in fruiting body structures.

Evolution of the Cytoskeleton – Remarkable conservation of sequence within prokaryotes and eukaryotes, but not between them, represents a conundrum for cellular evolution. The solution appears to be the drastically changing protein functions, with nucleotide triphosphate binding as the retained protein structure between these two domains of life.

Simultaneous origin of homochirality, the genetic code and its directionality – Additional conundrums surround the origins of Earth’s biochemistry, and are addressed here in a new hypothesis.

The evolving concept of tumor microenvironments – Cellular evolution today.



  1. The changes we see will never create a new kind of life. So if evolutionists want to end the arguments all they have to do is, get their brilliant heads together and assemble a ‘simple’ living cell. This should be possible, since they certainly have a very great amount of knowledge about what is inside the ‘simple’ cell.

    After all, shouldn’t all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a ‘simple’ cell.

    If it weren’t so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.

    Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence ‘FOR’ evolution for THEMSELVES.

    Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material, that is with NO cell material, just the ‘raw’ stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth’s recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!

    Oh, you don’t believe the ‘original’ Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!

    PS: Please don’t lie about the ‘first life’ problem, scientists are falling all over themselves to make a living cell. Many have admitted publicly that it is a monumental problem. And is many years away from happening, if ever. Logical people understand this problem and have rightly concluded that an Intelligent Designer was absolutely necessary. Think of it this way, if all the brilliant scientists on earth can’t do it how on earth can anyone believe that it happened by accident?????

  2. Thanks Jim, you’ve earned a second entry into the stupid bin.

    Now, does anyone actually want to discuss science, instead of that AiG-fed stupidity?


%d bloggers like this: